By now, you’re probably familiar with the classic photo of a white woolen coat hanging in a white velvet box at the end of a line at a red woolen mill.
But if you’re a redhead, you might not know this particular story about a red woman and her red wool coat.
That’s because it’s not the first time the photo has been used to illustrate the history of the American redhead.
But that’s where things get interesting.
Today, a group of British historians are using the photo as part of a project to highlight the role of women in redheads.
Their hope is to show how redheads have been marginalized and erased from American history.
The researchers say that while redheads were used as a way to preserve the culture and customs of the early 19th century, they were marginalized and excluded from American culture.
This has been a real problem for American redheads because, they say, “a redhead’s culture has historically been very much associated with the culture of the working class.”
The research team, called Redheads and the American Revolution, wants to use the photo to “show redheads as part and parcel of American history, a story of American success, American culture and American history in general.”
The researchers behind Redheads have set out to show that the Redhead and the Revolution are not mutually exclusive.
In fact, Redheads were a powerful and powerful part of the culture during the American Revolutionary War.
In the book The Revolution and Redhead, author and history professor David J. Shirk discusses how the redhead was used by white settlers to protect the fur trade.
This was the time period in which many of the white settlers had arrived in the New World and had a stronger sense of ownership and control over their lands.
In this period, the red head was a symbol of strength and endurance, Shirk writes.
And it was a red head who carried the red flag, which meant that the white man had to do whatever he could to protect his turf.
So redheads, who were white, were very much a part of American culture in the 19th and early 20th centuries.
Sharkers claim that while the American Redhead has always been part of white American culture, it’s only in the past 150 years that redheads and their history have been made into an American symbol.
It’s this history of oppression that has prevented the red-haired woman from becoming a part and part of history.
For example, a red-head is not an American citizen.
In 1892, the Supreme Court ruled that the citizenship requirement for all Americans must be met by proving the person is a member of a race, not a nationality.
So for example, you could have a redheaded white man who was born in Pennsylvania, but who is a white person.
He can’t become an American because he’s not a citizen.
This makes the citizenship requirements difficult to meet for people like Shirk.
According to Shirk, many redheads who did become American citizens did not do so because of their red hair.
Instead, they felt oppressed by being barred from owning property.
And this was a way for people to reclaim ownership over their land, said Shirk in a press release.
This idea of reclaiming ownership from white people was something that had been important to many Americans, Shirks told Business Insider.
Shirk said that this idea of red-headed women as a powerful part in American culture is “a really powerful image that can’t be easily erased.”
“There’s this idea that women are a separate and separate category and that all of them are equal in the eyes of society,” Shirk said.
“I think it’s a very strong image that people have of redheads that are part of that.”
The project has been funded by the British Library and the National Archives, but the researchers say they are not looking to fund the project with public funds.
They plan to make the book available to anyone who wants to buy it.
The project is called The Revolution in Redhead: Redheads in American History, and the researchers hope to get people to look at the redheads story through their lens.
“We have to do this because the way we’re thinking about redheads is, redheads are not a separate group, they’re a part, part of our history,” said Shirke.